As the promotion of next spring’s No Time To Die, the 25 James Bond movie gets underway, the merry go round of who will replace Daniel Craig as 007. The first thing I would say is that I am only talking about male actors, Bond is a man, and as M (Judi Dench) says in GoldenEye “a sexist, misogynist dinosaur. A relic of the Cold War”. There have been many suggestions that Ian Fleming’s character was actually a closeted or repressed homosexual. This isn’t as outlandish as it sounds. The books were written at a time when it was illegal to be gay. A gay friend, who knows a lot more than me on the subject once told me that the secret services actively recruited gay men at this time. Putting all this aside, the character would change too much if a woman were cast. That’s not to say there isn’t room for a female 00 agent. I would love to see a different film within the same universe. That said, EON Productions are making a rare departure from Bond with The Rhythm Section due for release early next year, before No Time To Die. Based on Mark Burnell novel of the same name the film promises to be a more gritty and realistic take on the genre. Blake Lively stars as Stephanie Patrick an accidental/reluctant spy. The film has an estimated $50 million budget, as a new property, this is considered a big risk, Bond 25 however cost five times that and will be expecting to smash $1billion in ticket sales. I hope the film does well for two reasons, the second book is the best in the series, I would love it to see it adapted. Secondly it would help the idea of a female 00. 
Back to Bond: I understand Tom Hiddleston is still favourite, and for my money a good choice. Tom Hardy, never seems far from the conversation; great actor but I don’t see him as Bond. Sam Heughan seems to have come out of nowhere, and is the favourite of some bookies. I didn’t know who he was and had to look him up. This is often a good thing when it comes to Bond, an A list actor has never been cast in the role. This also bodes well for lesser know actors: James Norton, and Jack Lowden, as well as TV stars Aidan Turner and Richard Madden. It isn’t so great for big names: Michael Fassbender, Idris Elba, and Chris Hemsworth. Of the three my pick would be Fassbender who would make a great brooding Bond in the vein of Timothy Dalton. Elba would have been a good choice, but I feel the ship has sailed. At 47, he would be in his 50’s by the time his first movie came out, and his 60’s by the third or fourth. Hemsworth, I would discount for two reasons: I personally would prefer to see a British or Irish actor in the part, and I would rather see him in more comedic roles.
Other actors getting odds of 10/1 or better include Jamie Bell, Cillian Murphy, Henry Cavill, Damian Lewis. Bell, I don’t see as Bond, I can’t explain why. Cavill, I think that ship has sailed. Murphy, I would never have considered, but think he would be an interesting choice (even better if he used his Peaky Blinders accent!). I’m warming to the idea of Lewis, just as he seems to be dropping out of contention. The two others who seem to have dropped out of contention are Benedict Cumberbatch and Henry Golding. Cumberbatch probably comes with too much baggage, If you mention the name of any of the actors who have played Bond: Connery, Lazenby, Morre, Dalton, Brosnan, Craig; Bond is the first think you think of. Cumberbatch is already Doctor Strange and Sherlock Holmes. As for Golding, he has dropped out the race as quickly as he entered it. From what little I have seen of him, he seems to have the looks and the charm, but I haven’t seen anything to convince me he is a very good actor.
So who will be the seventh James Bond? Probably either nobody from this list, or one of the lesser know actors. But as strange as it sounds, it doesn’t matter that much. George Lazenby aside (50 years ago), they have never chosen a poor actor. How good or bad the films are rests with the script and direction. I have always maintained that Timothy Dalton is the best Bond, he plays the character closest to the one in Ian Fleming’s novels, but he didn’t make the best films. With GoldenEye (1995) Pierce Brosnan made one of the best Bond films, but his subsequent films ranged from poor to terrible. This was purely down to the scripts, and nothing to do with the actor.
The interesting thing will be the setup. Will Ralph Fiennes, Naomie Harris, and Ben Whishaw return? From one point of view, I would like to see them back as they are all great, on the other hand, a clean reboot with a new whole cast would be interesting too. I like the idea of doing something different, either, going back to the books and making a 1950/60’s set period spy movie. Or a modern day version, but going back to the start, Bond Year One! A movie about a younger Bond being recruited. I have also for a long time advocated bringing back Timothy Dalton, or even Pierce Brosnan to play an older retired Bond.
Given the timescales these movies work to, I would expect to see Bond 26 in 2024/25.
Fandango Groovers Movie Blog 